Daniel G. Becker, MD FACS
Becker Nose and Sinus Center, LLC
400 Medical Center Drive, Suite B
Sewell and Princeton, New Jersey USA
856 589-6673
856 589-3443 fax
drbecker@therhinoplastycenter.com
Clinical Professor & Director of Facial Plastic Surgery
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Philadephia, Pennsylvania
Clinical Professor
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia
Introduction
In the modern era of rhinoplasty, the introduction of external rhinoplasty was greeted by enthusiastic advocates and also met with spirited opposition. Over time, however, the tenor of this debate has become more ecumenical. Most surgeons now recognize the broad utility of both endonasal and external approaches. Most understand that there are situations when a given approach offers advantages and may be considered preferable. Most also agree that there is a large "grey area," where either the endonasal or the external approach would be appropriate, and the choice may be considered a "toss-up." Most surgeons readily acknowledge that surgeon comfort with a procedure is an appropriately important factor.